The apostle, in the former verse, had spoken of our slavery and
bondage to Satan, from which Christ came to deliver us; now, because sin is the
cause of it, he cometh to speak of our redemption from sin: 'In whom we have
redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.' Here is -
I. The author.
II. The benefit.
III. The price.
The point is this :-
Doct. That one principal part of our redemption by Christ is
remission of sins. Here I shall show you :-
1. What remission of sins is.
2. The nature of redemption.
3. That remission of sins is a part, and a principal part of it.
First, What remission of sins is.
Both terms must be explained - what sin is, and what is the forgiveness of
sin.
For the first, sin is a violation of the law of the eternal and living
God: 1 John iii. 4, 'Whosoever committeth sin, transgresseth also the law, for
sin is the transgression of the law.' God is the lawgiver, who hath given a
righteous law to his subjects, under the dreadful penalty of a curse. In his
law there are two things - the precept and the sanction. The precept is the
rule of our duty, which showeth what we must do, or not do. The sanction or
penalty showeth what God will do, or might justly do, if he should deal with us
according to the merit of our actions. Accordingly, in sin, there is the fault
and the guilt.
[1.] The fault: that man, who is God's subject, and so many ways obliged to him
by his benefits, instead of keeping this law, should break it upon light terms,
and swerve from the rule of his duty, being carried away by his own
ill-disposed will and base lusts. It is a great and heinous offence, for which
he becometh obnoxious to the judgment of God.
[2.] The guilt: which is a liableness to punishment, and that not ordinary
punishment, but the vengeance of the eternal God, who every moment may break in
upon us. Where there is sin, there will be guilt ; and where there is guilt,
there will be punishment, unless we be pardoned, and God looseneth the chains
wherewith we be bound.
Secondly, Forgiveness of sin is a dissolving the
obligation to punishment, or a freedom, in God's way and method, from all the
sad and woful consequences of sin. Understand it rightly.
[1.] It is not a disannulling the act, as it is a natural action; such a fact
we did, or omitted to do; factum, infactum fieri nequit - that which is
done, cannot be undone. And, therefore, though it be said, Jer. 1. 20, 'The
iniquity of Jacob shall be sought after, and the sins of Judah, and they shall
not be found; for I will pardon them whom I reserve;' yet that must not be
understood as if God would abolish the action, and make it as if it had never
been, for that is impossible. But he would pass by, and overlook it as to
punishment.
[2.] Nor is it abolished as a faulty or criminal action, contrary to the law of
God. The sins we have committed are sins still, such actions as the law
condemneth. Forgiveness is not the making of a fault to be no fault. An accused
person may be vindicated as innocent, but if he be pardoned, he is pardoned as
an offender, he is not reputed as one that never culpably omitted any duty, or
committed any sin, but his fault is forgiven upon such terms as our offended
governor pleaseth 'I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and forgive all
their sins,' Heb. viii. 12. They are pardoned as sins.
[3.] Nor is the merit of the sinful act lessened; in itself it deserveth
condemnation to punishment. Merito operis, it is in itself damnable, but
quoad eventum: Rom. viii. 1, 'There is no condemnation to them that are
in Christ Jesus,' etc.; because the grace of the gospel dischargeth us from it.
We must still own ourselves deserving the wrath of God, which maketh for our
constant humiliation and admiration of grace; so that he that is pardoned still
deserveth punishment.
[4.] It remaineth, therefore, that forgiveness of sin is a dissolving the
obligation to punishment, or passing by the fault, so as it shall not rise up
in judgment against us to our confusion or destruction: the fault is the
sinner's act, the punishment the judge's, which he may forbear on certain terms
stated in the law of grace. He passeth by the fault so far, that it shall not
be a ground of punishment to us. I prove it :-
Secondly, The nature of redemption.
What is redemption by the blood of Christ?
In opening it to you, I shall prove six things :-
1. A captivity or bondage.
2. That from thence we are freed by a ransom, or price paid.
3. That none but Christ was fit to give this ransom.
4. That nothing performed by Christ was sufficient till he laid down his
life.
5. That thence there is a liberty resulting to us.
6. That we do not actually partake of the benefit of this ransom till we be in
Christ.
[1.] Our being redeemed supposeth a captivity and bondage. All men in their
unrenewed estate are slaves to sin and Satan, and subject to the wrath of God.
That we are slaves to sin appeareth by scripture and experience: Titus iii. 3,
'Serving divers lusts and pleasures;' John viii 34, 'Whosoever committeth sin,
is the servant of sin.' Men imagine a life spent in vanity and pleasure to be a
very good life; it were so, if liberty were to be determined by doing what we
list, rather than what we ought. But since it is not, experience showeth that
they are convinced of their brutish satisfactions as mean and base, yet they
cannot leave them, for that true and solid happiness offered by Christ. Now as
they are under sin, so they are under Satan, 'who worketh in the children of
disobedience,' Eph. ii. 2; and hath a great power over wicked men in the world,
who fall to his share, as the executioner of God's curse, and are taken captive
by him at his will and pleasure, 2 Tim. ii. 26. This is the woful captivity and
servitude of carnal men, that they fall as a ready prey into the mouth of the
roaring lion. Now, for this they are liable to the curse and wrath of God;
therefore called 'children of wrath, even as others,' Eph. ii. 3 that is,
obnoxious to his righteous displeasure and punishment. Thus were we lost in
ourselves under sin, Satan, and the wrath of God, from which we could no way
free ourselves; and if grace had not opened a way for us to escape, what should
we have done?
[2.] To recover us, there was a price to be paid by way of ransom to God. We
are not delivered from this bondage by prayer or entreaty, nor by strong hand
or mere force, nor yet by the sole condescension and pity of the injured party,
without seeking reparation of the wrong done, but by the payment of a
sufficient price, and just satisfaction to provoked justice. This price was not
paid indeed to Satan, who detaineth souls in slavery as a rigid usurping tyrant
or merciless jailor (from him indeed we are delivered by force), but the price
was paid to God. Man had not sinned against Satan, but against God, to whom it
belongeth to condemn or absolve. And God being satisfied, Satan hath no power
over us, but is put out of office, as the executioner hath nothing to do when
the judge and law is satisfied. Now, that redemption implieth the paying of a
price is clear, because the word importeth it, and the scripture often uses
this metaphor: Mat. xx. 28, 'The Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but
to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many;' 1 Tim. ii. 6, 'Who gave
himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.' Redemption in the
general is a recovery out of our lost estate. God could have saved men by the
grace of confirmation, but he chose rather by the grace of redemption. This
recovery was not by a forcible rescue, but by a ransom. Christ, in recovering
his people out of their lost estate, is sometimes set forth as a lamb,
sometimes as a lion. In dealing with God, we consider him as the lamb slain,
Rev. v. 5, 6: in dealing with Satan, and the enemies of our salvation, he doth
as a lion recover the prey. But why was a ransom necessary? Because God had
made a former covenant, which was not to be quit and wholly made void but upon
valuable consideration, lest his justice, wisdom, holiness, veracity, authority
should fall to the ground.
[3.] None was fit to give this ransom but Jesus Christ, who was God-man. He
was man to undertake it in our name, and God to perform it in his own strength;
a man that he might be made under the law, and humbled even to the death of the
cross for our sakes; and all this was elevated beyond the worth of created
actions and sufferings by the divine nature which was in him, which perfumed
his humanity, and all done by it and in it. This put the stamp upon the metal,
and made it current coin, imposed an infinite value upon his finite obedience
and sufferings. By taking human nature a price was put into his hands to lay
down for us: Heb. x. 15, and his divine nature made it sufficient and
responsible, for it was the blood of God: Acts xx. 28, 'Feed the church of God,
which he hath purchased with his own blood;' and Heb. ix. 13, 'For if the blood
of bulls and goats, and the ashes of an heifer, sprinkling the unclean,
sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of
Christ, who through the Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your
conscience from dead works to serve the living God?' It was that flesh and
blood which was assumed into the unity of his person - as a slip or branch
grafted into a stock is the branch of the stock, and the fruit of it is the
fruit of the stock. A naked creature without this union could not have
satisfied the justice of God for us. This made his blood a precious blood, and
his obedience a precious obedience. In short, God-man, the Son of God and the
son of Adam, was he that redeemed us. So, in short, there were different
parties to be dealt with before the fruit of redemption could be obtained: God,
satan, man. God was an enemy that could not be overcome, but must be
reconciled; Satan was a usurper, and was to be vanquished with a strong hand;
man was unable and unwilling to look after the fruits of redemption, and our
obstinacy and unbelief could only be overcome by the Spirit of Christ.
[4.] Nothing performed by Christ could be a sufficient ransom for this end,
unless he had crowned all his other actions and sufferings by laying down his
life, and undergoing a bloody and violent death. This was the completing and
crowning act. Partly to answer the types of the law, wherein no remission was
represented without a bloody sacrifice ; partly from the nature of the thing,
and the fulness of the satisfaction required until all that was finished, John
viii. 20. Death was that which was threatened to sin, death was that which was
feared by the sinner. Many ignorant people will say the least drop of Christ's
blood was enough to save a thousand worlds. If so, his circumcision had been
enough without his death. But Christ is not glorified but lessened by such
expressions. Surely his death was necessary, or God would never have appointed
it; his bloody death suited with God's design. God's design was to carry on our
recovery in such a way as might make sin more hateful, and obedience more
acceptable to us.
[5.] From this ransom and act of obedience there is a liberty resulting unto
us, for the redeemed are let go when the ransom is paid. Now this liberty is a
freedom from sin, that we may become the servants of God: Rom. vi. 22, 'Being
made free from sin, ye became servants of righteousness.' Christ came not to
free us from the duty of the law, but the penalty and curse thereof. To free us
from the duty of the law is to promote the devil's interest. No; he freed us
from the wrath of God that we may serve him cheerfully, to establish God's
interest upon surer and more comfortable terms, to restore us to God's favour
and service: to God's favour, by the pardon of sin; to his service by writing
his laws on our hearts and minds. Sometimes our redemption from the curse is
spoken of: Gal. iii. 13, 'Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law,
being made a curse for us.' Sometimes our redemption from sin : Titus ii. 14,
'Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity;' and so by
consequence from the power of the devil, which is built on the curse of the law
and reign of sin. Satan's power over us doth flow from the sentence of the
condemnation pronounced by the law against sinners, and consists in that
dominion sin hath obtained over them. If the curse of the law be disannulled,
and the power of sin broken, he is spoiled of his power: Col. ii. 14, 15,
'Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was
contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; and having
spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing
over them.'
[6.] That we are not partakers of this liberty, nor of the benefit of this
ransom, till we are in him, and united to him by faith, for the text saith, 'In
whom we have redemption by his blood.' Certainly we must be turned from Satan
to God before we are capable of receiving the forgiveness of sins, Acts xxvi.
18. We do not actually partake of the privileges of Christ's kingdom till we be
first his subjects: 'Who hath delivered us from the power of Satan, and hath
translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: in whom we have redemption
through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.' Christ and his people are an
opposite state to the devil and his instruments. While we are under the
opposite power we belong not to Christ, and the privileges of his kingdom
belong not to us; but as soon as we are translated and put into another estate,
then we have the first privilege, 'remission of sins.' Look, as in the fall
there was sin before guilt, so in our reparation there must be conversion,
renovation, or repentance before remission. We are first effectually called or
sanctified, and then justified and glorified. Man's recovery to God is in the
same method in which he fell from him. It is first brought about by a new
nature, and communication of life from Christ. He regenerateth that he may
pardon, and he pardoneth that he may further sanctify and make us everlastingly
happy.
Thirdly, That remission of sins is a part, and a principal part of
redemption.
1. How is it a part or fruit of redemption? I answer - Redemption is taken
either for the impetration or application.
2. As it is a part, so it is a principal part. This will appear if you consider the evil we are freed from.
II. The good depending on it: Luke i. 77, 'To give us the knowledge of salvation by the remission of sins.' Eternal life dependeth on it, for you are not capable of enjoying God till his wrath be appeased. As all evil was introduced by sin, so all happiness by pardon. This is an initial blessing, which maketh way for the rest.
Use, of exhortation: To persuade you to seek after this benefit. All
of us once needed it, and the best of us, till we are wholly freed from sin,
still need it.
1. We all of us once needed it; for we are not only criminal persons liable to
condemnation, but actually condemned in the sentence of God's law: John iii.
18, 'He that believeth not is condemned already.' Now, should not a condemned
man make means to be pardoned? and should not we accept of God's terms,
especially when there is but the slender thread of a frail life between us and
execution? He that securely continues in his sins, despiseth both the curse of
the law and the grace of the gospel. Oh, consider! nothing but a pardon will
serve the turn - not forbearance on God's part, nor forgetfulness on yours.
2. The best of us still need it: partly because though we be justified, and our state be changed, yet renewed sins need a new pardon. We are still sinning against God - either we are omitting good, or committing evil. What will we do if we be not forgiven? Renewed sins call for renewed repentance. We do not need another Redeemer, or another covenant, or another conversion; yet we do need renewed pardon, partly because our final sentence of pardon is not yet passed, nor shall be passed till the last judgment: Acts iii. 19, 'Repent ye, therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.' We are now pardoned and justified constitutively by the tenor of the new covenant, and there by description. The sincerity of our faith and repentance is not presently evident; it is possible, but difficult, to know that we are sincere penitent believers; but at last, when our pardon is actually pronounced by our judge's mouth, sitting on the throne, then all is clear, evident, plain, and open. And partly because daily infirmities call for daily repentance. We do not carry ourselves with that gravity and watchfulness, but that we need to cry for pardon every day.